|
| |
You
Are Here:
Home > Trail End Exhibits
>
Temporary Exhibits >
Wedding Belles & Beaux > Courtship & Dating
Courtship & Dating
Gentlemen Callers |
Correspondence |
The "Flock" System |
The
Importance of Dance
In cities twenty-five years ago, a young girl
had beaux who came to see her one at a time; they in formal clothes and manners,
she in her "company best" to receive them. ... A young man was said to be
"devoted" to this young girl or that, but as a matter of fact each was acting a
role, he of an admirer and she of a siren, and each was actually an utter stranger
to the other.
Emily Post, Etiquette, 1922
| As Emily Post noted, "love at first sight
and marriage in a week is within the boundaries of possibility," but more often
than not, young ladies and gentlemen took the time to get to know each other a
bit before they became linked together for life. |
| Gentlemen Callers |
|
According to the rules of etiquette, a gentleman caller of the
1890s such as John Kendrick was supposed to arrive in formal clothes and sit
stiffly in the front parlor until the object of his affection made her
appearance. He was to keep his hat in his hands and his hands to himself! He was
to be both sincere in his intentions and worthy of her attentions. If he didn’t,
he and his lady friend could become the topic of unwanted gossip. In 1891,
Mattie Wulfjen wrote to her sister Eula about the recent courtship and marriage
scandals in Greeley, Colorado:
Lilly H-----r was married last week to Mr. P-----n, a worthless good-for-nothing
fellow. Her family knew nothing of it, until the ceremony had been performed.
Carrie told me that they had no idea she was engaged, but they opposed the
fellow from the first. They are heart-broken.
Tracy M-----h had to be married to a girl in Estes Park. He tried to get out of
it, but they forced him to take her.
Poor Minnie, she has got it bad. A-----n gave her every reason on earth to make
her think he was in love with her, and even went so far as to tell her he
intended to give her an elegant diamond ring … Ask John if he thinks him
sincere; Minnie has made up her mind to take him if he proposes.
As Mattie noted, it was hard for young ladies to know if their
callers were serious or just being flirtatious. “Oh,” she wrote, “if girls could
only read the sincerity of man’s natures! But alas! We have to remain in
oblivion!”
|
back to top
|
Correspondence |
With no computers and few telephones, communication between belles and beaux had
to take place either in person or by letter. Just as was the case with personal
calls, very strict rules governed correspondence. Because letters were physical
items that could be read by anyone other than the intended, discretion was key.
The author could not be too intimate, too emotional or too casual, and every
statement had to be couched in a good deal of very wordy prose. As one author
noted:
Remember that whatever you write is written evidence
either of your good sense or your folly, your industry or carelessness, your
self-control or impatience. What you have once put in the letterbox, may cost
you lasting regret, or be equally important to your whole future welfare. And,
for such grave reasons, think before you write, and think while you are
writing.
Not
everyone grew up knowing how to write a proper, discreet letter. Therefore,
publishers printed a number of books designed to assist men and women in
their personal correspondence. One such book was The Ladies Letter Writer
(full title: A New Letter-Writer for the Use of Ladies Embodying Letters on
the Simplest Matters of Life, and on Various Subjects, With Applications, for
Situations, Etc., and a Copious Appendix of Forms of Address, Bills, Receipts
and Other Matters, Compiled from the Best Previous Works on the Subject, with
Considerable New Additions, Hints on Style, Etc., Etc.).
Published first in the 1860s and regularly reissued for
decades afterwards, The Ladies Letter Writer contained samples of letters
that could be sent in response to all things courtship and matrimonial, from
requests to call and proposals to acceptances and refusals. A similar volume -
aimed towards gentlemen rather than ladies - provided the following advice for
men wishing to send letters to their lady loves:
The love letter ought to be more easy to write than any
other, premising always that the writer is really under the influence of the
grand passion. Upon first addressing the object of your regard, there should
be no prudent hesitation about committing yourself too far. You either love
the fair being whom you address or you do not. If you are not decided upon
that point, you do wrong to write at all; but if you earnestly desire to unite
your destiny with hers, you just, in the first instance, give her to
understand that you entertain for her a sincere an earnest admiration.
Your letters should express respect blended with exalted
and overpowering passion, and this applies more particularly to your first
letter. A tame, hesitating lover cannot make a strong impression upon the
hearts of the gentle sex. The writer must show the woman of his choice that
his love is too real and too violent to be prudent, or to have any place for
selfish fear of compromising himself. He must compromise himself, fearlessly
and thoroughly, in his first address to her, and have his mind made up to
stand the hazard of the die; for the first thing a man has to do when
disclosing his love for a woman, is, to convince her that he does love her, and
that he loves her a great deal, and her alone.
Let this be the aim of your letters; speak just as you
feel, and speak out all that you feel, in straight-forward, simple, honest
language – which is always the language of strong emotion – and if she be a
virtuous woman, whose heart has not been hackneyed by the arts of coquetry,
she will know how to estimate your sincerity and your devotion.
It is best to use gilt-edged paper, and of a fine
quality; write in good hand if possible; fold and seal your missive neatly,
and direct it in a bold plain manner, that it may not fall into the hands of
the wrong person, and expose your lady-love to the jeers and malicious remarks
of idle and heartless worldings.
Because of the intimate nature of correspondence, it was
essential that, if a relationship ended or if either party married someone else,
all letters be returned to their author. In 1921, upon severing both their
engagement and their relationship, Diana Cumming requested one of her beaux (who
shall remain unnamed) to return all her correspondence:
I hate to ask you this - tho' after all, why should I? -
so - will you please send me my letters? I'll return yours when I get home, if
you want them.
The young man returned promptly returned dozens of Diana's
letters - but not all of them. In 1927, upon his own marriage, he sent the
following lighthearted note along with a 1921 letter from Diana in which she
demanded that, if he loved her, he needed to "prove it - by actions, not by
words":
Dear Diana - As executor of the estate of H.L.W.,
bachelor, I am returning the last remaining evidence. Said guy died a cheerful
death and expects to live happily forever after.
|
|
 |
back to top
| The "Flock" System |
|
By
the time John and Eula’s children, Manville and Rosa-Maye Kendrick, began dating
in the 1910s and 20s, the “flock system” had come into play. As Emily Post
described it, this type of dating allowed men and women to come to know each
other in a more natural setting than that experienced by previous generations:
A flock of young girls and a flock of young men form a little group of their own
– everywhere they are together. In the country they visit the same houses … they
play golf in foursomes, and tennis in mixed doubles. In winter at balls they sit
at the same table for supper, they have little dances at their own homes, where
scarcely any but themselves are invited; they play bridge, they have tea
together, but whatever they do, they stay in the pack.
|
back to top
|
The Importance of Dance |
|
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries,
nearly every wedding was followed by a dance in which the bride danced the first
dance with her husband, the second with her father, and the rest with her male
guests. Therefore, it was important that the bride and groom know how to dance.
In fact, in the general scheme of things, it was important for everyone
to know how to dance, because dancing was one of the most important social
activities of the time. A girl’s social well-being was sometimes attached to her
ability to dance. Physical appearance, financial status and intelligence need
not matter, said Emily Post, if a girl could master the most important steps to
success – those executed on the dance floor:
The girl who is beautiful and dances well is, of course, the ideal ballroom
belle. But, all things being more or less equal, the girl who dances best has
the most partners. Let a daughter of Venus or the heiress of Midas dance badly,
and she might better stay at home. Also, conversational cleverness is of no
account in a ballroom; some of the greatest belles ever known have been as
stupid as sheep.
Instead
of attending public dance classes, most people learned to dance as children by
partnering with older relatives at informal home dances such as those held at
Trail End, out at the OW Ranch, and in small houses all over town. Brothers
danced with sisters, nieces with uncles and cousins with cousins.
Once the waltz, fox trot, schottische and two-step were mastered,
young men and women were ready for any type of event at which dancing was
featured – even a “small dance” at the White House, such as those attended by
Manville and Diana Kendrick.
|
Return to
Temporary Exhibits or continue to
Manville & Diana
back to top
| |
|